Thursday, 30 June 2016

Spring Lane Building - furniture update

On Tuesday 28 June, a delegation from the Learning Spaces Working Group took a day out of the diaries to travel to sunny* Macclesfield, to be hosted by Broadstock Office Furniture, the successful tenderers for the Spring Lane Building.

We spent a number of hours trying out lots of samples of chairs, collaborative furniture and the bespoke seminar room table we have had designed for the building.



IMG_0393.JPG
*not so sunny

Seminar chairs

We are ordering almost 500 of these chairs, so as a working group we were committed to selecting the correct chair the fit the brief we had produced: putting comfort and durability first.

After testing a number of chairs, the group settled on a version of the Torsion Air chair (pictured below), without castors (we hate castors!) and with a fabric to match the colour palette of the building. These were by far the most comfortable chair, a very comfortable mesh back (which surprised us - we were looking for upholstered) and they have some movement in the back which worked really well.  To top things off they carry a 12 year guarantee!

The chair frames will be black, with a black mesh back and fabric seat base.

We have a number of other learning spaces upgrades this summer and we will aim to use the same seminar chair, as far as appropriate, in these spaces too.

Seminar tables


We have had a bespoke table made for the seminar rooms - with solid wooden legs (which match the trim colour of the seminar room doors) and a walnut top (to match the main room doors). They look mighty fine, if we do say so ourselves!  Good job we tested these out though - the beam under the table needs a minor adjustment to be completely clear of tall people’s knees!

One of the great things about these tables, we feel, is that they take on board the feedback we have received from users of our whole estate. Specifically they are solid and do not pivot in the middle. They are not on wheels. The frame design is such that you can sit at any of the four sides of the table and fit underneath without hitting a leg (or support beam now!)

We’re also putting in a couple of low-level benches in each room too, on the inside of the horseshoe, so that classes can move about without moving the chairs - allowing a large group to breakout at different points in the session.

IMG_0387.JPG
Professor John Robinson, Lee Woodall (Broadstock), Ruth Hale and Thomas Ron consider the the chosen ‘Torsion Air’. You can see the table and matching bench in the background.


Agile/Experimental spaces

Broadstock presented the Working Group with four samples to work with (pictures to follow):
  1. A small raked lecture room that can break into collaborative mode, moving people (not furniture).  So the front row is standard table height and chair, progressively increasing in height until the back row is ‘poser’ height.
  2. A workshop layout, with 5-6 ‘plectrum’ tables that we may technology-enable.  This would work for a true collaborative layout although would not comfortably function for a round-table discussion.  Frames would be white to match the tables.
  3. A casual seminar room - using soft seating in a teardrop / horse-shoe, with a selection of writing surfaces but more ‘lounge’ like.

The working group are recommending we proceed with 3 x experimental / agile seminar layouts and 23, high quality boardroom seminars.  This will be decided by the Steering Group next Monday.  We will look to replace furniture elsewhere on campus if/as/when new furniture layouts/styles are required to fit with the new York Pedagogy roll-out.

Informal Learning spaces


Thankfully for the group, Liz Waller, Deputy Director of Information Services had taken a day last week to visit ahead of the working group delegation, creating detailed plans for the main flexible learning spaces with a blend of:
  • Informal group/lounge furniture
  • Individual workspaces (tables and chairs)
  • Individual lounge chairs
  • Print/copy area fit out

Utilising the similar furniture, a number of smaller touch-down areas exist in the building and will follow the same format.

During the visit, the delegation decided to recommend that the ‘Reception’ area of the building be deferred until the main central stairs were installed, to see how the building feels in that area first.

IMG_0390.JPG


Colour scheme


Everyone’s favourite topic!

The Spring Lane Building has an autumnal theme of mellow yellow, burnt orange, tree green, red and grey. Broadstock presented a number of palette swatches and the delegation supported the closest matching palette, as previously outlined in the design intent document for the building and agreed by the working group.

Thanks to Liz, John Robinson, John Maddison, Jeanne Nuechterlein, Geoff Krauss, Sarah Bacsich, Ruth Hale and YUSU officer Thomas Ron for taking time for the visit. And to colleagues Lee and Wendy at Broadstock for hosting us.

We’re excited that the building is really coming together now. The furniture is due to arrive in early September, with plenty of time to spare before the first use early October. We can't wait for you to see it!

Matt

Thursday, 19 May 2016

A full run down of the planned improvements to learning spaces

At the April meeting of the Learning Spaces Working Group we (Space Management) shared a list of all the planned work we know of that will be taking place within our learning spaces portfolio before the next academic year. It was a surprise to most of the group - both in scale but also how items end up on the list.  We think that’s quite fair - how do rooms or items within rooms get selected to be on a refurbishment list?

The answer is: in lots of ways.
  1. Lifecycle works - we know that certain items within a room will only last so long - and we usually swap those out just in the nick of time, so the room does not suffer any downtime and the experience is not impacted. The obvious candidates here are the technology pieces. They normally last about an eight-year cycle, with regular maintenance during that time.
  2. Your feedback - through a number of channels. It could be to Timetabling directly, via your department who will make a representation to the Facilities Manager, or via the University Helpdesk (ext 5555). 
  3. The Facilities Managers - using their local condition surveys and knowledge.
We’re going to be transparent about the investment in these spaces moving forward - and the working group will have their say on priorities or input from the membership they represent. These things take time to change, so for the current year we’re working on the list as presented - but with the caveat that the design and product selection will be approved via the working group, and aim to be consistent with the consultation and feedback on the Spring Lane Building.



Room
Furniture
Decor
Flooring
AV
ATB/056
🎫
🎫

🎫
ATB/057
🎫
🎫

🎫
Biology - various

🎫


B/B/102
🎫



B/B/103
🎫



B/M/023 (survey pending)



🎫
B/M/049 (survey pending)



🎫
B/M/052 (survey pending)



🎫
BS/005



🎫
C/A/102 (Easter 2016)

🎫
🎫
🎫
C/B/102
🎫
🎫
🎫
🎫
D/L/007
🎫



D/L/028 (Hendrix Hall)



New Column Boards
D/L/036

🎫


D/N/016
🎫



D/056 (Summer term 2016)*
🎫
🎫
🎫
🎫
D/N/104
🎫



D/N/159
🎫
🎫


DS/006
🎫



Room
Furniture
Decor
Flooring
AV
DS/008
🎫


🎫
DS/009
🎫


🎫
DS/010
🎫


🎫
E/056
🎫
🎫
🎫
🎫
E/118
🎫
🎫
🎫
🎫
E/119
🎫
🎫
🎫
🎫
E/120
🎫
🎫
🎫
🎫
E/107
🎫
🎫
🎫
🎫
James G/N
🎫



LMB
🎫



P/L/001



🎫
P/L/002



🎫
RCH/248 & 250



🎫
V/C/123



🎫
V/N/044 (Summer term 2016)*
🎫
🎫
🎫
🎫
V/N/045

🎫

New Column Boards
V/N/119

🎫


V/N/120

🎫


V/N/123

🎫


V/N/123a

🎫


V/N/139
🎫
🎫


V/X/230 (Easter 2016)
🎫
🎫
🎫
🎫
V/X/231 (Easter 2016)
🎫
🎫
🎫
🎫
W/N/218
🎫
🎫
🎫
🎫

That’s a long list, and we’ll be undertaking this room when the rooms are at their quietest - mainly after the exam period is over.

The working group have commissioned a direct consultation, for each space, with the users who have been taught or teaching in those spaces this year. That’s most likely one of you (especially if you’re reading this) - your response will be really valuable!

All the best,

Matt.